Homer: A Guide to Selected Sources: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:


== Chronology ==
== Chronology ==
Homer’s chronology was considered as uncertain as his birthplace. The ancient biographies present lists of different views on the matter and, with the exception of the {{#lemma: Pseudo-Herodotus | [[Pseudo-Herodotus, Life of Homer | Ps.-Hdt. ''Vit. Hom.'']] 38}}, do not make a choice between different possibilities. In most cases Homer’s date is calculated, rather than in absolute terms, in relation to that of specific events or people (whose date may itself be flexible), thus sheding light on ancient perceptions of the relationships between the poet and the chosen term of comparison. The {{#lemma: Ionian migration | [[Pseudo-Plutarch, Life of Homer 1.1-5 | Ps.-Plut. ''Vit. Hom.'' 1]].3<br />[[Pseudo-Plutarch, Life of Homer 2.1-4 | Ps.-Plut. ''Vit. Hom.'' 2]].3<br />[[Anonymus, Life of Homer 1 | Anon. ''Vit. Hom.'' 1]].4)}} is present in accounts by scholars such as Aristotle, Aristarchus and Eratosthenes. Homer’s chronological distance from the {{#lemma: Trojan war | [[Pseudo-Plutarch, Life of Homer 1.1-5 | Ps.-Plut. ''Vit. Hom.'' 1.5]]<br />[[Proclus, Life of Homer | Procl. ''Vit. Hom.'']] 7<br />[[Suda, s.v. Homer | ''Suda'', s.v. Homer]] 4<br />[[Anonymus, Life of Homer 1 | Anon. ''Vit. Hom.'' 1]].4<br />[[Anonymus, Life of Homer 3 | Anon. ''Vit. Hom.'' 3]].2)}}, and therefore his reliability as a reporter of it, is at issue in several sources, and in Herodotus, Histories 2.53: still missing. The discussion of Homer’s and Hesiod’s relative chronology, on which the story of their {{#lemma: contest | [[Certamen | ''Certamen'']] 4-5<br />[[Guide to the Certamen]]}} depends, was also a means of reflecting on the content, authority, and antiquity of their respective poems. (For more detailed discussions, see Graziosi 2002: 90-124 and Beecroft 2010: 79. For Homer’s and Hesiod’s relative chronology, see also Most 2006 and Koning 2010.)


----
----

Revision as of 16:25, 28 April 2013

Paola Bassino

The name of the author is notably absent from the Homeric epics. There is also a more general lack of autobiographical information in the epics attributed to Homer (the little that can be gleaned about the poet’s voice in the Iliad is discussed by Graziosi 2013). The author’s absence enables audiences and readers to invent Homer without much constraint in the form of autobiographical claims made within the epics attributed to him.

Legends about Homer answered the curiosity of early audiences, who listened to travelling performers (rhapsodes) claiming to recite the great works of an absent author ‘Homer’ (Burkert 1987, West 1999, Graziosi 2002, West 2003a, Kivilo 2010, Nagy 2010, Lefkowitz 2012). The process must have started early: Tatian Tatianus, Ad Gr. 31 informs us that the life of Homer was the subject of interest and research already in the sixth century BCE and Heraclitus Heraclitus, fr. 56 D.-K. knew the legend concerning Homer’s death. According to Pausanias, Callinus Callinus, fr. 6 West mentioned Homer as the author of the Thebaid as early as the seventh century BCE, on this difficult testimony see further Bowie 2010: 152).

Early legends and anecdotes were eventually collected in formal Lives, which prefaced Homer’s works in the manuscript tradition. The most important are a Pseudo-Herodotean Life of Homer Ps.-Hdt. Vit. Hom., two short biographical notices at the beginning of a Pseudo-Plutarchean Ps.-Plut. Vit. Hom. 1
Ps.-Plut. Vit. Hom. 2
treatise on Homer, a Life of Homer in Proclus’ Procl. Vit. Hom. Chrestomathy, the Suda Suda, s.v. Homer entry on Homer and three anonymous short biographies Anon. Vit. Hom. 1
Anon. Vit. Hom. 2
Anon. Vit. Hom. 3
. The Certamen Homeri et Hesiodi Certamen, an earlier version of which must have featured in Alcidamas’ Musaion, also contained extended biographical information.

Parents and Genealogy

Ancient sources list several options for the names of Homer’s alleged parents, often without expressing preference for any. The Certamen Certamen 3 stands out for putting together names of seven fathers and seven mothers (sometimes with a source), that can be arguably paired up so as to form alleged parental couples – some of which are confirmed by external evidence too (West 1967: 445-446). The passage testifies to attempts to make Homer a direct descendant of his characters, especially Odysseus and Telemachus, or of divine figures such as the Muse Calliope. According to one of the best attested traditions, which was circulating widely by the fifth century BCE, Homer’s father was the Smyrnean river Meles Critias, fr. 50 D-K
Certamen 3
Ps.-Plut. Vit. Hom. 2.2
Suda, s.v. Homer 1
Anon. Vit. Hom. 1.1
Anon. Vit. Hom. 2.1
Anon. Vit. Hom. 3.1
, often paired up with an otherwise unknown Cretheis. Detailed genealogies Schol. Pind. Nem. 2.1
Ps.-Hdt. Vit. Hom. 25
Suda, s.v. Homer 5
Pind. Fr. 265 SM
Phot. Bibl. 319
that illustrate Homer’s kinship with, among others, Orpheus and Hesiod, are attested from the fifth century BCE (see Hesiod: A Guide to Selected Sources). Legends regarding Homer’s own offspring, probably created by rhapsodic groups, such as the Homeridae, to legitimise their own role of performers of Homeric poetry, are also transmitted.

Birthplace

Several cities claimed to be the birthplace of Homer and, as was acknowledged Certamen 2
Procl. Vit. Hom. 2]]
also in antiquity, this variety of birthplaces contributed to creating a truly Panhellenic poet, who could be claimed by every city because he belonged to none. The strongest and most ancient claims about Homer’s origins were those of Smyrne, Chios and Colophon Lucian, Ver. Hist. 2.20-22
Certamen 2
Ps.-Plut. Vit. Hom. 2.2
Procl. Vit. Hom. 2
Anon. Vit. Hom. 2.2
Anon. Vit. Hom. 3.1
, often mentioned together.

Smyrne’s tradition might have begun before 600 BC (Jacoby 1933: 31; Graziosi 2002: 75). The Smyrnean river Meles was often said to be either the place where the poet was given birth Ps.-Hdt. Vit. Hom. 3
Ps.-Plut. Vit. Hom. 1.2-3
Procl. Vit. Hom. 3
by Cretheis, the most ancient souce for this being the fifth-century scholar Stesimbrotus Anon. Vit. Hom. 1.2, or the very father of Homer (see above). From this river the poet also took his original name, according to the biographical tradition, Melesigenes.

The Chian tradition seems to have been known already in the sixth or fifth century BCE to Anaximenes, Pindar and Simonides Simon. fr. 17 West
Anon. Vit. Hom. 1.2
. The Lives relate several biographical episodes that occurred to Homer in Chios but the strongest link between the city and Homer seem to have been the Homeridae, a guild of rhapsodes who claimed to be the poet’s descendants (see contra Fehling 1979). They probably brought the Homeric poems to Athens (see most recently Nagy 2010) and by Thucydides’ times the image of Homer as the blind poet from Chios Simon. fr. 17 West
Pl. [Hipparch.] 228b5-c1
Thuc. 3.104.5
was dominant.

Colophon’s claims on Homer are rooted in the mention of the ‘old divine singer’ in Margites Margites fr. 1 West, and were supported by Nicander and Antimachus Anon. Vit. Hom. 1.2
Anon. Vit. Hom. 3.1
.

Other well attested traditions were those related to Cyme (Hippias and Ephorus Ps..Plut. Vit. Hom. 1.2
Anon. Vit. Hom. 1.1
and Cyprus (Callicles Certamen 3; Pausanias Paus. 10.24.2-3 and, for the Cypria, see below); Athens was also known as the birthplace of Homer, also on the basis of linguistic arguments (Aristarchus and Dionysius Thrax Schol. Il. 13.197
Ps.-Plut. Vit. Hom. 2.2
Anon. Vit. Hom. 3.1
. By the Byzantine period Suda, s.v. Homer 2, no less than twenty possible birthplaces of Homer were known.

Chronology

Homer’s chronology was considered as uncertain as his birthplace. The ancient biographies present lists of different views on the matter and, with the exception of the Pseudo-Herodotus Ps.-Hdt. Vit. Hom. 38, do not make a choice between different possibilities. In most cases Homer’s date is calculated, rather than in absolute terms, in relation to that of specific events or people (whose date may itself be flexible), thus sheding light on ancient perceptions of the relationships between the poet and the chosen term of comparison. The Ionian migration Ps.-Plut. Vit. Hom. 1.3
Ps.-Plut. Vit. Hom. 2.3
Anon. Vit. Hom. 1.4)
is present in accounts by scholars such as Aristotle, Aristarchus and Eratosthenes. Homer’s chronological distance from the Trojan war Ps.-Plut. Vit. Hom. 1.5
Procl. Vit. Hom. 7
Suda, s.v. Homer 4
Anon. Vit. Hom. 1.4
Anon. Vit. Hom. 3.2)
, and therefore his reliability as a reporter of it, is at issue in several sources, and in Herodotus, Histories 2.53: still missing. The discussion of Homer’s and Hesiod’s relative chronology, on which the story of their contest Certamen 4-5
Guide to the Certamen
depends, was also a means of reflecting on the content, authority, and antiquity of their respective poems. (For more detailed discussions, see Graziosi 2002: 90-124 and Beecroft 2010: 79. For Homer’s and Hesiod’s relative chronology, see also Most 2006 and Koning 2010.)



Bibliography